2026-06-23-Alexopoulos
Reviewed project overview and current state of analysis. Dr A had several suggestions: - [] repeat group level analysis (Fig 3 from AES poster) using the non-exclusionary EZ/PZ/IZ/NIZ labels.
Commented that it may be more meaningful to see group differences at interictal contacts rather than SOZ contacts, given that MRF is an interictal scan by definition.
Overall, we shouldn’t necessarily expect to see group-level differences. Resection of ther orbitofrontal cortex and insula for example are widely different from cytoarchitecture perspective. May be much worthwhile to take a step back from the SEEG data and look more closely at each individual case - with particular attention to the nonlesional and FCD patients.
- [] get better delineation of pathology FCD 2A? 2B? etc
- [] summarize each patient in more detail
Suggested comparing resection cavity T1/T2 against the healthy controls
- [] get included/not-included in resection cavity labels per contact
- [] make resection cavity masks for each patient
Could consider looking at resection T1/T2 against nearby peri-resection (i.e. rim of retained tissue) from within the patient as well.
Plan to meet again after above